Results 1 to 25 of 31

Thread: Humbuckers vs Trembuckers

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Canadian in Prague
    Posts
    3,212

    Default Humbuckers vs Trembuckers

    I'm thinking of buying the Seymour Duncan '78 and am wondering is there is a tonal difference between the humbucker version and trembucker on that or any pickup really.
    It'll go on a guitar with a Floyd. I know spacing wise I should get a trembucker, I have a SH-11 with regular humbucker spacing in my guitar now with a Floyd and its fine. I just heard some prefer the tone to the hums rather then trems. Any validity to these statements or people just being anal? Thanks for the help.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Portugal, Europe
    Posts
    960

    Default

    many people have "dirty" opinions about it.
    I heard that a humb. in a floyded guitar have lower volume in the E strings. Migh be true, might be not.
    Bruno

    Kramer Focus 2000 cream/beak
    Ibanez RG 170 DX L
    Marshall 6100LM 30th Anniversary
    Line 6 spider 3 75W
    Harley Benton HB-40R

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Canadian in Prague
    Posts
    3,212

    Default

    Yea I dunno I havn't experienced that at all with my SH-11 about the volume drop

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    North Hollywood, CA.
    Posts
    770

    Default

    This is so Weird...I was just going to start this same thread I just replaced a pickup in a Kramer 84 with a Duncan Custom Custom. It didn't seem to fit over the strings properly, then I realized it wasn't a Trem spaced pickup

    But I have to say it sounds really good. Sometimes I wonder if Trem spaced pickups are a Placebo

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Canadian in Prague
    Posts
    3,212

    Default

    I got the same pickup in my Striker. I like it a lot. How does it sound in the '84 compared to the stock?
    Some say they can't really hear a difference, others complain about volume loss on the high e (possibly if your pickup isn't close enough to the strings) and other say the humbuckers have a better tone over trembucker and some just use them for asthetic puposes so theres no gaps between the mounting rings and the poles line up. I know EVH used humbuckers up until he switched to Music Man. I dunno, just wanting to get people opinions before I shell out $160. If the tone is the same I'd go for a trembucker.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    North Hollywood, CA.
    Posts
    770

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kramer.geetar View Post
    I got the same pickup in my Striker. I like it a lot. How does it sound in the '84 compared to the stock?
    Some say they can't really hear a difference, others complain about volume loss on the high e (possibly if your pickup isn't close enough to the strings) and other say the humbuckers have a better tone over trembucker and some just use them for asthetic puposes so theres no gaps between the mounting rings and the poles line up. I know EVH used humbuckers up until he switched to Music Man. I dunno, just wanting to get people opinions before I shell out $160. If the tone is the same I'd go for a trembucker.

    Comparing the CC to the stock 84 pickup is pretty close. I will say the CC seemed to have a bit more bass, it was warmer than the stock 84t

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    WV
    Posts
    1,556

    Default

    try slanting the pickup to get a better string over polepiece alignment.. it works depending on your pickup route obviously, best of luck though
    Good KF deals with: Eddiedbone- Halo 71- Heem6-Dan-Moku-Kramerclassic1-Dave67-RockinJim-FullCrib-A.F.U.-Nightrider-Mr.Whipper-KB7010-Sumrnitz-Jonasberg..Warrenp099-KeithP-JoeyM-Hunter008-da5charl-Ianreed99


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •