Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 31

Thread: Humbuckers vs Trembuckers

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Canadian in Prague
    Posts
    3,214

    Default Humbuckers vs Trembuckers

    I'm thinking of buying the Seymour Duncan '78 and am wondering is there is a tonal difference between the humbucker version and trembucker on that or any pickup really.
    It'll go on a guitar with a Floyd. I know spacing wise I should get a trembucker, I have a SH-11 with regular humbucker spacing in my guitar now with a Floyd and its fine. I just heard some prefer the tone to the hums rather then trems. Any validity to these statements or people just being anal? Thanks for the help.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Portugal, Europe
    Posts
    960

    Default

    many people have "dirty" opinions about it.
    I heard that a humb. in a floyded guitar have lower volume in the E strings. Migh be true, might be not.
    Bruno

    Kramer Focus 2000 cream/beak
    Ibanez RG 170 DX L
    Marshall 6100LM 30th Anniversary
    Line 6 spider 3 75W
    Harley Benton HB-40R

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Canadian in Prague
    Posts
    3,214

    Default

    Yea I dunno I havn't experienced that at all with my SH-11 about the volume drop

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    North Hollywood, CA.
    Posts
    773

    Default

    This is so Weird...I was just going to start this same thread I just replaced a pickup in a Kramer 84 with a Duncan Custom Custom. It didn't seem to fit over the strings properly, then I realized it wasn't a Trem spaced pickup

    But I have to say it sounds really good. Sometimes I wonder if Trem spaced pickups are a Placebo

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Canadian in Prague
    Posts
    3,214

    Default

    I got the same pickup in my Striker. I like it a lot. How does it sound in the '84 compared to the stock?
    Some say they can't really hear a difference, others complain about volume loss on the high e (possibly if your pickup isn't close enough to the strings) and other say the humbuckers have a better tone over trembucker and some just use them for asthetic puposes so theres no gaps between the mounting rings and the poles line up. I know EVH used humbuckers up until he switched to Music Man. I dunno, just wanting to get people opinions before I shell out $160. If the tone is the same I'd go for a trembucker.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    WV
    Posts
    1,566

    Default

    try slanting the pickup to get a better string over polepiece alignment.. it works depending on your pickup route obviously, best of luck though
    Good KF deals with: Eddiedbone- Halo 71- Heem6-Dan-Moku-Kramerclassic1-Dave67-RockinJim-FullCrib-A.F.U.-Nightrider-Mr.Whipper-KB7010-Sumrnitz-Jonasberg..Warrenp099-KeithP-JoeyM-Hunter008-da5charl-Ianreed99


  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    North Hollywood, CA.
    Posts
    773

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kramer.geetar View Post
    I got the same pickup in my Striker. I like it a lot. How does it sound in the '84 compared to the stock?
    Some say they can't really hear a difference, others complain about volume loss on the high e (possibly if your pickup isn't close enough to the strings) and other say the humbuckers have a better tone over trembucker and some just use them for asthetic puposes so theres no gaps between the mounting rings and the poles line up. I know EVH used humbuckers up until he switched to Music Man. I dunno, just wanting to get people opinions before I shell out $160. If the tone is the same I'd go for a trembucker.

    Comparing the CC to the stock 84 pickup is pretty close. I will say the CC seemed to have a bit more bass, it was warmer than the stock 84t

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Brooklyn, NY
    Posts
    2,356

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by munkee View Post
    Comparing the CC to the stock 84 pickup is pretty close. I will say the CC seemed to have a bit more bass, it was warmer than the stock 84t
    which do you like better?
    My Gear
    Hohner HW-200 (Natrual Grain)
    Slammer By Hamer XP-1 Standard (Wine Red)
    Kramer 1984 Custom (Bullseye Black)
    Takamine EG531SSC (Black)
    Kramer Proaxe Standard (Black Sparkle)

    1987 Marshall JCM 800 2205 and JCM 800 Lead 1960B

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    North Hollywood, CA.
    Posts
    773

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Shwayman11 View Post
    which do you like better?
    If I had to pick it would be the CC. It's pretty close.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    North Wales, United Kingdom
    Posts
    302

    Default

    Correct me if I am wrong....

    You know why Kramer designed the Baretta with a slanted humbucker route? It was to solve the problem of the pole pieces missing the bass strings and lacking the bottom end. It was a great idea and one of the reasons you should install the non trembucker or non F spaced humbuckers in any guitar with a slanted humbucker route.

    If on the other hand you have a non angled route like the 1984 reissue then you should try the trembuckers, they are not a placebo as mentioned by someone here. I believe the first trembucker was the parallel axis as featured in the Proaxe. I have trembuckers in my own prototypes and I changed a standard Duncan Screamin Demon to a trembucker version and there was a tonal difference in the bottom end on a Kamikaze II hybrid - more bass

    The best thing is to experiment though and find out for yourselves! You can always fit a Schaller hot stuff,X2N, Dimebucker or Invader as pole spacing doesn't matter on these beasts, I remember the hot stuff humbucker on my comet Baretta, so much bass, it was something else

    Rob

  11. #11
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    North Hollywood, CA.
    Posts
    773

    Default

    You are right about the slanted pickup. They were copying EVH's idea. The interesting thing is if it made a big difference why didn't he do it in the 5150/1984 guitars

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Canadian in Prague
    Posts
    3,214

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by munkee View Post
    You are right about the slanted pickup. They were copying EVH's idea. The interesting thing is if it made a big difference why didn't he do it in the 5150/1984 guitars
    True, if you look at the pictures of his 5150 on VK the pole pieces aren't lined up. I guess it depends how you like it, there is no wrong way is there just personal preferences.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Portugal, Europe
    Posts
    960

    Default

    Hey does the focus 2000 had slanted pickups?
    Bruno

    Kramer Focus 2000 cream/beak
    Ibanez RG 170 DX L
    Marshall 6100LM 30th Anniversary
    Line 6 spider 3 75W
    Harley Benton HB-40R

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Hippolytushoef, the Netherlands
    Posts
    7,584

    Default

    It's simple, the bigger Gibson (widerspaced) PU's did not fit Fender (narrow spaced) layout....so to have the poles with a Gibson HB aligned on a Fender spaced Axe, EVH slanted the PU. So fender spaced guitars normally have regular HB's, Gibson wider spaced use Trembuckers and F-spaced PU's.

    Nowadays it's kinda blurry, since there are all kindof spaced bridges out there.....
    Pel Custom Guitars & Tube Ampz
    http://www.pelcustomguitars.com


    Custom LesPel --> BTR2000 --> Nady TD1 - Big MUFF pi - Keeley TS9 Flexi --> Keeley Cry Baby --> Marshall 36 Watt --> 1960A/1960B Stack
    PacerC1 - Claw PacerC2 - Beak Pacer Deluxe - ClawRetta - Claw Vanguard - Maple Vanguard 'Classic V' - SpaceKline Baretta - SpaceBo Claw ProRetta - Forum IV Bass - 420S Bass (all lefties)
    http://www.myspace.com/pelcustomguitars

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Canadian in Prague
    Posts
    3,214

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by pel666 View Post
    It's simple, the bigger Gibson (widerspaced) PU's did not fit Fender (narrow spaced) layout....so to have the poles with a Gibson HB aligned on a Fender spaced Axe, EVH slanted the PU. So fender spaced guitars normally have regular HB's, Gibson wider spaced use Trembuckers and F-spaced PU's.

    Nowadays it's kinda blurry, since there are all kindof spaced bridges out there.....
    I thought its the other way around, Gibson has the regular spaced humbuckers and Fender uses the F-spaced (trembuckers). Thats why they called it F-spaced for Fender

  16. #16
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Hippolytushoef, the Netherlands
    Posts
    7,584

    Default

    There is a vid on youtube with Eddy explaining, he liked the Fender model but wanted the Gibson tone in it...he took the Gibson HB and slammed it in a Strat style guitar. At least that is what he said...to make the pole pieces align he slanted it.

    All I do myself is look at the bridge spacing period, Dimarzio says:

    F-spaced humbuckers should be used in the bridge position on all guitars with string spacing at the bridge of 2.1" (53 mm) or greater.
    Pel Custom Guitars & Tube Ampz
    http://www.pelcustomguitars.com


    Custom LesPel --> BTR2000 --> Nady TD1 - Big MUFF pi - Keeley TS9 Flexi --> Keeley Cry Baby --> Marshall 36 Watt --> 1960A/1960B Stack
    PacerC1 - Claw PacerC2 - Beak Pacer Deluxe - ClawRetta - Claw Vanguard - Maple Vanguard 'Classic V' - SpaceKline Baretta - SpaceBo Claw ProRetta - Forum IV Bass - 420S Bass (all lefties)
    http://www.myspace.com/pelcustomguitars

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Hippolytushoef, the Netherlands
    Posts
    7,584

    Default

    Now I start to question myself on the Eddy thing, this is what I found as well:


    http://www.jag-stang.com/fSpaced.htm
    Pel Custom Guitars & Tube Ampz
    http://www.pelcustomguitars.com


    Custom LesPel --> BTR2000 --> Nady TD1 - Big MUFF pi - Keeley TS9 Flexi --> Keeley Cry Baby --> Marshall 36 Watt --> 1960A/1960B Stack
    PacerC1 - Claw PacerC2 - Beak Pacer Deluxe - ClawRetta - Claw Vanguard - Maple Vanguard 'Classic V' - SpaceKline Baretta - SpaceBo Claw ProRetta - Forum IV Bass - 420S Bass (all lefties)
    http://www.myspace.com/pelcustomguitars

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Near Chicago
    Posts
    1,014

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kramer.geetar View Post
    I thought its the other way around, Gibson has the regular spaced humbuckers and Fender uses the F-spaced (trembuckers). Thats why they called it F-spaced for Fender
    You are right. Trembuckers (from SD) and F-spaced (from Dimarzio) are the same thing: Fender pole spaced humbuckers. Because of the trem, fender strings are wider spaced apart, and thus the pickup poles are wider spaced apart.
    Last edited by Unhomed; 04-07-2008 at 01:17 PM. Reason: spelling
    Rik

    ...I am the son, and the heir, of a shyness that is criminally vulgar....

    Kramerless for the first time in decades.
    Boogie Bodies Aztec Gold
    Boogie Bodies Azrec Gold Roadster

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Portugal, Europe
    Posts
    960

    Default

    BTW what is slanted?
    Bruno

    Kramer Focus 2000 cream/beak
    Ibanez RG 170 DX L
    Marshall 6100LM 30th Anniversary
    Line 6 spider 3 75W
    Harley Benton HB-40R

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Canadian in Prague
    Posts
    3,214

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Warlord View Post
    BTW what is slanted?
    Placed at an angle, like a Fender Strat has a slanted bridge pickup or the Baretta has a slanted pickup as opposed to having it placed normally like EVH's Kramer 5150 (straight)

  21. #21
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    North Hollywood, CA.
    Posts
    773

    Default

    I just spoke with a Seymour Duncan Dealer and he has spoke with the reps at SD regarding TRembucker/Humbucker differences. The reps stated it it merely a "Cosmetic" difference, it doesn't effect tone.

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Portugal, Europe
    Posts
    960

    Default

    but to convert to slanted you have to dig up the body
    Bruno

    Kramer Focus 2000 cream/beak
    Ibanez RG 170 DX L
    Marshall 6100LM 30th Anniversary
    Line 6 spider 3 75W
    Harley Benton HB-40R

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
    Posts
    1,178

    Default

    I allways guess that the ¨F¨ was for Floyd...
    '87 Kramer Stagemaster Custom
    '81 Kramer Pacer Standard
    custom made Les Paul
    VOX Tonelab LE
    Epiphone Valve Jr. moded!!!
    ADA MP1
    BBE 422A
    ADA Microtube 100

    AFFA
    Support Your Local 81

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Canadian in Prague
    Posts
    3,214

    Default

    Just thought about something here....

    Ok so Seymour Duncan says the difference between a trembucker and humbucker is merely cosmetic as munkee stated earlier in the thread but if you think about it theres got to be a tonal difference. A trembucker is wider thats obvious but then so would the windings be, meaning more material used. I know its not a huge difference but over the course of winding that pickup with that many winds it adds up.....unless they compensate somehow because of that and give it slightly less windings to even it out Am I over thinking here?

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    1,873

    Default

    There has to be some differance in the windings on a F/Trem spaced pickup. I found just how much trying to fit a bridge pickup in a Wolfgang. The bobbin on a F/trem spaced pup is quite a bit shorter. So to me it seems they have less wraps, yet both JB's have about the same ohm reading's.

    A WG pup normally has a flat base, a Gibby spaced pup even with short legs is to tall to fit. But a trem spaced pup with short legs is just about the right hight.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •